Deredel A. Rosario

Badge #23291, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 40th Precinct since March 2021
Service started January 2020, made $60,600 last year, Tax #969342

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: False Official Statements
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Discourtesy: Action
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Complaints

2 Complaints
17 Allegations
10 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Substantiated (Charges)
7 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
4 Unable to Determine
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202400709, January 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202302038, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Religion
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Religion
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: False Official Statements
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202400709, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202302038, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Offensive Language: Religion Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Religion Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Action Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: False Official Statements Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Action Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Jawaneh, Mamud vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 811480/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 8, 2023

Stephens, Karen vs City of New York et al.
Case # 719442/2018, Supreme Court - Queens, February 11, 2019