Miguel J. Vivas

Miguel J. Vivas

Miguel J. Vivas
Badge #3748, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at 69th Precinct since January 2023
Service started July 2013, made $133,000 last year, Tax #955642

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26548
Closed: 11/3/2022
Case: 2022-26714
Closed: 10/10/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$7,500   Gregory, Jose R. vs City of New York, et al., 2017 KCSC KCSC 517139/2017
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Exonerated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202202999, May 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202105636, September 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202102131, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #201706773, August 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202202999, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202105636, September 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202102131, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #201706773, August 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26548
Closed: 11/3/2022
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to supervise. Failed to conduct an investigation. failed to make proper notifications. made or caused to be made false or inaccurate entries in Department records..
Penalty: Vacation days (25 days)

Case: 2022-26714
Closed: 10/10/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful removal to a hospital.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $7,500 total settlements.

Thomas, Kenniel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 804624/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 20, 2023

Sibert, Lloyd vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 802036/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 9, 2022

Sibert, Lloyd vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 531100/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, February 9, 2022
Complaint
Description: On September 1, 2020, Plaintiff was inside his apartment when he was aggressively approached by police officers Jordan Gambino, Yuri Enorme, Michael Sannella, Miguel Vivas, Frankie Tong, and Rosemary Gallardo, as well as 10 unnamed officers. The officers violently grabbed and contorted plaintiff's arms behind his back and applied metal handcuffs to his wrists in an excessively tight fashion. Plaintiff was unlawfully targeted for arrest because of his race, religion or ethnicity.

Gregory, Jose R. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 517139/2017, Supreme Court - Kings, September 11, 2017, ended July 2, 2019
$7,500 Settlement

Other Documents