James Malave

Badge #2435, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at 41st Precinct
Service started June 1995, ended August 2015, Tax #916113

Lawsuit settlements:
$20,000   Grant v. The City of New York et al, SDNY SDNY 16CV00229
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
4 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200412194, December 2004
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200208061, November 2002
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200007419, September 2000
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200412194, December 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 15 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200208061, November 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 41 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200007419, September 2000
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 41 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Grant v. The City of New York et al
Case # 16CV00229, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$20,000 Settlement
Description: Plaintiff was in a store when an employee accused him of committing a left the previous month. Officers arrived and watched the surveillance tape, which showed someone different from Plaintiff. Nevertheless, Officers arrested Plaintiff, took him to the 41st precinct, and charged him with Petit Larceny and Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the 5th Degree. Officers failed to save the exculpatory surveillance tape and charges were later dismissed.