Matthew Vogt

Badge #5589, White Male
Also served at 102nd Precinct
Service started February 1994, ended March 2019, Tax #907533

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number

Lawsuit settlements:
$35,000   Anestis, James J. vs City of New York, et al., 2013 EDNY EDNY 13CV07125
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
3 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded

Complaint #200405011, April 2004
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Female
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #9903064, July 1999
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
additional details

Complaint #9700723, February 1997
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property Seized
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200405011, April 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Female Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #9903064, July 1999
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Female, 48 Substantiated (Charges)
additional details
Complaint #9700723, February 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property Seized Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Anestis, James J. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV07125, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 26, 2013, ended September 30, 2014
$35,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 19, 2010, at approximately 2:20 AM, Plaintiff was riding his motor vehicle when Officer Matthew Kwiecinski allegedly observed Plaintiff's vehicle make a left turn without signaling and pulled Plaintiff over. Plaintiff was stopped and detained against his will. Officer Kwiecinski requested Plaintiff's driver's license and registration, which Plaintiff complied with, and then ordered him out of the vehicle for a field breath test. Plaintiff peacefully declined to submit to the test. He was not intoxicated nor displayed intoxication. Officer Kwiecinski then placed him under arrest and charged him with driving while intoxicated and with refusal to take a breath test. Plaintiff was taken to the precinct,...