Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $427,500 total settlements.
Simmons, Robert Jr., vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 019674/2002,
Supreme Court - Kings, May 30, 2002, ended February 25, 2013
$360,000 Settlement
London v. City of New York et al
Case # 05CV05103,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$37,500 Settlement
Amended Complaint,
Stipulation
Badger et al v. City of New York et al
Case # 06CV06003,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$30,000 Settlement
Stipulation,
Second Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers broke into Plaintiffs' home with guns drawn, assaulted and tightly handcuffed all 3 Plaintiffs, searched their home for an hour, damaging property, and then took plaintiffs to the 71st Precinct, and then Central Booking where they were released because the DA declined to Prosecute Plaintiffs.