Michael Lupo

Badge #14048, White Male
Former Police Officer at Transportation Bureau Highway District
Also served at 108th Precinct, Highway Unit 04
Service started February 1994, ended April 2015, Tax #906673

Complaints

3 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200506963, June 2005
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200205617, April 2002
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 54
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 54
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200003823, June 2000
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: White Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200506963, June 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Male Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Male Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200205617, April 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 54 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Hispanic Female, 54 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200003823, June 2000
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object White Male, 39 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.