Michael F. Duquette

Michael F. Duquette

Michael F. Duquette
Badge #2270, White Male
Police Officer at Midtown South Precinct since April 2022
Service started October 2021, made $68,800 last year, Tax #973083

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Complaints

2 Complaints
18 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
10 Unable to Determine
6 Unfounded

Complaint #202309620, October 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202301614, February 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Disability
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202309620, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Hispanic Male, 45-49 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202301614, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Gender Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Disability Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Other Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Gender Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.