Joseph Modica

Badge #2280, White Male
Former Sergeant at Narcotics Division Queens Southeast INIT
Service started January 1986, Tax #888083

Complaints

5 Complaints
9 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #9700545, February 1997
Allegation: Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Mace
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9602937, June 1996
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #9002654, September 1990
Allegation: Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #8702821, July 1987
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Black
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #8700810, February 1987
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #9700545, February 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Beat Unsubstantiated
Force: Mace Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Person Searched Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9602937, June 1996
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Curse Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #9002654, September 1990
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #8702821, July 1987
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Curse Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Black Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #8700810, February 1987
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove Complainant Uncooperative
Discourtesy: Nasty Words Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Kamar, Ansumana vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 028607/2020, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 31, 2020