Jose Medina

Former Lieutenant at Internal Affairs Bureau
Also served at 50th Precinct
Service started July 1996, ended September 2017, Tax #917983
Hispanic Male

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
0 Substantiated
7 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200007161, August 2000
Allegation: Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone
Complainant: Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone
Complainant: Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200001266, March 2000
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant: White Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9800530, February 1998
Allegation: Discourtesy: Other- Discourtesy
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #9704228, November 1997
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200007161, August 2000
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone Male, 50 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone Male, 50 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200001266, March 2000
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search White Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9800530, February 1998
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Other- Discourtesy Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #9704228, November 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Unfounded
Discourtesy: Nasty Words Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Bender, Sherry vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV04386, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, July 29, 2014, ended September 4, 2015
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On June 17, 2011, Sherry Bender was traveling home after receiving an emergency root canal when she was stopped by police officers in the subway in Manhattan and arrested as a result of a license lookup performed by the NYPD. Plaintiff alleges false arrest, excessive force, IIED, NIED< abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and unlawful search/seizure.