Scott Cohen

Badge #1468, White Male
Former Sergeant at 66th Precinct
Service started August 1993, ended February 2009, Tax #914324

Complaints

4 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200804075, March 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200510441, September 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9503870, August 1995
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #6294330, July 1994
Allegation: Abuse of Authority
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200804075, March 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Hispanic Female, 50 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200510441, September 2005
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9503870, August 1995
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Nasty Words Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #6294330, July 1994
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.