Chardy S. Alberto

Badge #21159, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 30th Precinct since September 2017
Service started January 2013, made $120,000 last year, Tax #953624

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Pepper spray (2)
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25279
Closed: 2/28/2024

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$2,110   Government Employees Insurance Company Aso Cash, Robyn vs City of New York, 2019 CCQ CCQ 005153-2019
$30,000   Ibanez, Tina vs City of New York, et al., 2017 BCSC BCSC 026449/2017E
View Details

Articles

Harlem Woman's Police Brutality Accusations Upheld By Watchdog, Patch.com, 6/13/2022

Complaints

3 Complaints
11 Allegations
6 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202002550, April 2020
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Terminated
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, February 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #201805302, June 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201800138, December 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202002550, April 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Male, 15-17 Unfounded
Force: Pepper spray Black Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Discourtesy: Word Male, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Force: Physical force Male, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Pepper spray Male, 15-17 Substantiated (Charges)
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Terminated
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, February 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #201805302, June 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Male, 38 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201800138, December 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 28 Complaint Withdrawn
Discourtesy: Word Male, 28 Complaint Withdrawn
Force: Physical force Male, 28 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25279
Closed: 2/28/2024
Case Details:
  1. Made misleading or inaccurate statements during a civilian complaint review board interview.
  2. Wrongfully used physical force.
  3. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  4. Wrongfully discourteous.
Penalty: Vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $32,110 total settlements.

Pope, Crystal vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 150892/2022, Supreme Court - New York, February 8, 2022
Complaint
Description: On April 4, 2020, Plaintiff, a black American woman, was walking in her neighborhood in Manhattan when she observed Defendants, unknown police officers, dispersing a group of several adolescent Black youths who were enforcing social distancing guideline. Ina an apartment building she saw a police officer lifting one of the young boys from the neighborhood up by the neck and choking him. When she opened the door to the building to observe the police and she was immediately pepper sprayed by the Defendant officers without justification. As a result, she suffered physical and emotional damages.

Government Employees Insurance Company Aso Cash, Robyn vs City of New York
Case # 005153-2019, Civil Court - Queens, February 22, 2019, ended April 11, 2019
$2,110 Settlement

Ibanez, Tina vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 026449/2017E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 19, 2017, ended April 13, 2018
$30,000 Settlement

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 2/20/2024
Employment History Summary