Samantha A. Medina

Samantha A. Medina

Samantha A. Medina
Badge #11693, Hispanic Female
Police Officer at 90th Precinct since September 2023
Service started January 2016, made $75,100 last year, Tax #960924

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card


Complaints

2 Complaints
3 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202102384, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202008322, December 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details

Complaint #202102384, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 40-44 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #202008322, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25699
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-25700
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
  2. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2018-19799
Closed: 12/13/2018
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.
  2. Guilty: Operated a motor vehicle while ability impaired.
  3. Guilty: Unfit for duty.
  4. Guilty: Unfit for duty while armed.
  5. Guilty: Refused to submit to a breathalyzer.
  6. Guilty: Left the scene of an accident.
  7. Guilty: Failed to safeguard firearm.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (31 days), suspended w/o pay (19 days), vacation days (25 days)


Lawsuits

Abi-Saab, Ramzy vs City of New York, et Al .
Case # 702611/2020, Supreme Court - Queens, July 7, 2020, ended May 14, 2021
Zero Disposition

Other Documents