Michael Isler

Badge #17954, White Male
Former Police Officer at 103rd Precinct
Service started July 1989, ended June 2009, Tax #896134

Complaints

6 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200403613, April 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #200302447, April 2001
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9601930, April 1996
Allegation: Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9402128, June 1994
Allegation: Force: Dragged/Pulled
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #9400678, March 1994
Allegation: Force: Slap
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9102429, September 1991
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200403613, April 2004
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200302447, April 2001
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9601930, April 1996
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other - Force Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9402128, June 1994
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Dragged/Pulled Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #9400678, March 1994
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Slap Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9102429, September 1991
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Curse Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.