Kieran P. Ross

Badge #2868, White Male
Police Officer at 83rd Precinct since October 2020
Service started January 2019, made $66,400 last year, Tax #967310

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 6/29/2024
Case: 1 Allegation
Case: 2023-27737
Closed: 2/6/2023

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
14 Allegations
5 Substantiated
5 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
6 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202301642, February 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details

Complaint #202301198, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202206679, October 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202301642, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details
Complaint #202301198, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202206679, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Closed: 6/29/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2023-27737
Closed: 2/6/2023
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully deactivated their body-worn camera.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to activate their body-worn camera.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)


Lawsuits

Robles, Johnathan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 527154/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, September 26, 2023

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 11/10/2023