Daniel Gueren

Badge #5516, White Male
Former Police Officer at 70th Precinct
Service started April 1991, ended April 2011, Tax #899310

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word

Complaints

9 Complaints
14 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Complaint Withdrawn
7 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201002922, March 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200900486, January 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200810435, July 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: White Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #200807992, June 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200804013, March 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200611302, August 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
Complainant: Black Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200106001, August 2001
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9904607, September 1999
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Religion
Complainant: White Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9703772, October 1997
Allegation: Discourtesy: Other- Discourtesy
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201002922, March 2010
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200900486, January 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200810435, July 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 23 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 23 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) White Male, 23 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200807992, June 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 42 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200804013, March 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Male, 37 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200611302, August 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Gesture Black Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200106001, August 2001
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9904607, September 1999
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 22 Substantiated (Charges)
Offensive Language: Religion White Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9703772, October 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Other- Discourtesy Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.