Eric I. Stoll

Eric I. Stoll

Eric I. Stoll
Badge #30364, White Male, 39
Police Officer at 67th Precinct since December 2023
Also served at Human Resources Division
Service started January 2013, made $118,000 last year, Tax #954354

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25755
Closed: 5/20/2022

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
7 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Exonerated
2 OMB PEG Directive Closure
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202403672, April 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202008169, November 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202004616, June 2020
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201605977, July 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202403672, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Female, 40-44 OMB PEG Directive Closure
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 40-44 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202008169, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202004616, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other Black Female, 65-69 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201605977, July 2016
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25755
Closed: 5/20/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated uniform rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Hunte, Hugh vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 529923/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, November 22, 2022
Complaint
Description: On October 14, 2019, Plaintiff was taking his garbage cans from his home to the street when he was approached, stopped and seized by police officers Eric Stoll, Salvatore Mattaliano, and Lieutenant Kyong Kim. The officers falsely arrested Plaintiff for allegedly stealing multiple TVs . After Plaintiff was arrested, the officers provided the DA's office with false, misleading and incomplete evidence to support their arrest and charge him with crimes.

Other Documents