Michael Schuster

Badge #26843, White Male
Former Police Officer at 110th Precinct
Service started January 1986, Tax #889305

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Beat
Discourtesy: Other- Discourtesy

Complaints

5 Complaints
6 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #9704463, October 1997
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #9703386, September 1997
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #8801423, April 1988
Allegation: Discourtesy: Other- Discourtesy
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
additional details

Complaint #8703336, August 1987
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #8701906, May 1987
Allegation: Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9704463, October 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #9703386, September 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Person Searched Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #8801423, April 1988
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Other- Discourtesy Substantiated (Command Discipline)
additional details
Complaint #8703336, August 1987
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #8701906, May 1987
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Beat Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.