Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.
Mclaughlin, Rahmel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV04306,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 19, 2018, ended December 10, 2019
$7,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: The Defendant Officers initiated a stop of the vehicle the Plaintiff was operating. Defendant Officers Thomas Corey and Matthew Avelo and approximately two other defendant officers, physically removed the Plaintiff from the vehicle and threw him to the ground. The same Defendant Officers placed knees on Plaintiffs back, his head, and ankle and was kneed in the spine approximately three times. The Defendant Officers put excessively tight handcuffs on the Plaintiff, physically hurt him by shoving him on his stomach in the police vehicle and slamming the door on his head and right ankle. The Defendant Officers Corey and Avelo transported him to the hospital. The Plaintiff was charged with disorderly conduct.
Black, Tina vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV03055,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 22, 2015, ended October 21, 2015
$22,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officer approached Plaintiff while she was hanging gout on her stoop and when she asked him to leave he arrested her, took her to the 75th precinct, and charged her with Dis Con and Resisting Arrest, which were ACD'd