Andray Sukhu

Badge #4675, Hispanic Male
Former Sergeant at Brooklyn Court Section
Also served at 90th Precinct, 61st Precinct
Service started July 2004, ended December 2022, Tax #935805

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-17820
Closed: 1/17/2018
Case: 2017-17475
Closed: 6/19/2017

View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
12 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Unavailable
3 Complainant Uncooperative
5 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202102176, October 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
additional details

Complaint #201405454, June 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 60
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Offensive Language: Religion
Complainant: White Male, 60
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201310164, October 2013
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: White Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201308593, September 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201213869, September 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201115373, October 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200804020, March 2008
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: White Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: White Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202102176, October 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 35-39 Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
additional details
Complaint #201405454, June 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 60 Complaint Withdrawn
Offensive Language: Religion White Male, 60 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201310164, October 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other White Male, 42 Complainant Uncooperative
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 42 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201308593, September 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 28 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201213869, September 2012
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201115373, October 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 17 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 17 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200804020, March 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed White Male, 38 Complaint Withdrawn
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 38 Complaint Withdrawn
Discourtesy: Action White Male, 38 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-17820
Closed: 1/17/2018
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Said Sergeant, while on duty, responded to an incident involving an alleged motor vehicle accident resulting in injuries, and having determined that no vehicle accident occurred but that a passenger in a vehicle involved had been transported via ambulance to a hospital for alleged injuries, wrongfully failed to ensure that an aided report was prepared by police officers present at the scene.
  2. Guilty: Said Sergeant, while on duty, , wrongfully failed to direct police officers under his supervision to investigate the nature and extent of said passenger's alleged injuries.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), pre-trial suspension days (31 days), vacation days (29 days)

Case: 2017-17475
Closed: 6/19/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on duty, wrongfully impeded an official Department investigation
  2. Guilty: While on duty, having responded at about 1000 hours to an incident involving an off-duty Police Officer, wrongfully failed to confer with 110th precinct supervisors regarding this matter
  3. Guilty: While on duty, having responded at about 1000 hours to an incident involving an off-duty Police Officer, wrongfully failed to notify the 110th precinct desk officer of the details of said incident resulting in the failure to notify the precinct commander and duty Captain
  4. Guilty: While on-duty, said Sergeant made misleading or otherwise inaccurate statements during an official interview regarding his communications to the Internal Affairs command center subsequent to his response earlier that day to an off-duty incident involving an off-duty Police Officer
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), pre-trial suspension days (31 days), vacation days (29 days)