Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Dania Caceresolivo
Badge #11032,
Hispanic Female
Police Officer at 44th Precinct since January 2019
Service
started October 2017,
made $81,700 last year,
Tax #964415
Complaints
3
Complaints
9
Allegations
3
Substantiated
3
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202303517,
December 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202107009,
November 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #202200396,
May 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202303517, December 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Substantiated (Formalized Training) | |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Unable to Determine | |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Black Male, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Black Male, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202107009, November 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched | Female, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202200396, May 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 21-24 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2024-30629
Closed: 5/5/2024
Case Details:
- Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
- Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Training