Michael Sikos

Badge #25297, White Male
Former Police Officer at 46th Precinct
Service started April 1997, ended October 2020, Tax #919715

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force

Lawsuit settlements:
$9,500   Krah v. The City of New York et al, SDNY SDNY 11CV00744
$60,000   Nam et al v. The City of New York et al, SDNY SDNY 06CV08713
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200815195, October 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
Complainant: Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200606704, May 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Female, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Female, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200206119, August 2002
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Not Guilty - DCT
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200815195, October 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Gesture Male, 39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 39 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200606704, May 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Female, 53 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Asian Female, 31 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200206119, August 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Not Guilty - DCT
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $69,500 total settlements.

Quezada, Avis vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 310001/2009, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 6, 2010, ended October 6, 2016
Zero Disposition

Janneh v. The City of New York
Case # 311248/2011, Supreme Court - Bronx
Complaint

Krah v. The City of New York et al
Case # 11CV00744, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$9,500 Settlement
Settlement

Nam et al v. The City of New York et al
Case # 06CV08713, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$60,000 Settlement
Settlement, Complaint