Michael Calandra

Badge #5825, White Male
Former Detective Grade 2 at Intelligence Public Security Section
Also served at Transit Bureau District 33
Service started January 1988, ended April 2010, Tax #910245

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Force (2)

Complaints

10 Complaints
15 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (No Recommendations)
5 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200207503, November 2002
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200106512, August 2001
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200105641, July 2001
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9905465, December 1999
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #6393150, April 1993
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #6392411, November 1992
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #6392295, August 1992
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #6390365, November 1990
Allegation: Discourtesy
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #6390015, January 1990
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (No Recommendations)
additional details

Complaint #6389315, October 1989
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (No Recommendations)
additional details

Complaint #200207503, November 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Complainant Unavailable
Discourtesy: Word Male Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200106512, August 2001
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200105641, July 2001
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 31 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Black Male, 31 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Gesture Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9905465, December 1999
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #6393150, April 1993
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #6392411, November 1992
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #6392295, August 1992
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #6390365, November 1990
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #6390015, January 1990
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Substantiated (No Recommendations)
additional details
Complaint #6389315, October 1989
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Substantiated (No Recommendations)
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.