Randy Malkin

Former Lieutenant at Midtown South Precinct

Service started January 1983, Tax #878065

White Male

Complaints

5 Complaints

9 Allegations

0 Substantiated

1 Complainant Uncooperative

1 Exonerated

3 Unfounded

4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #9703298, September 1997

Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Force: Radio as club
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Black
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

additional details

Complaint #9702838, August 1997

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Sh Refuse Cmp
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #9301905, July 1993

Allegation:	Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #9201471, May 1992

Allegation:	Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club
CCRB Conclusion:	Complainant Uncooperative

additional details

Complaint #9201413, May 1992

Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #9703298, September 1997
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove		Exonerated
Force: Radio as club		Unfounded
Discourtesy: Curse		Unfounded
Offensive Language: Black		Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #9702838, August 1997
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sh Refuse Cmp		Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9301905, July 1993
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club		Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Curse		Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9201471, May 1992
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club		Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #9201413, May 1992
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove		Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.