Saul Alvarez

Badge #7621, Hispanic Male

Former Detective Grade 3 at Bronx North Narcotics District

Service started February 1994, Tax #905685

Complaints

2 Complaints

7 Allegations

0 Substantiated

2 Exonerated

3 Unfounded

2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200106392, August 2001

Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

additional details

Complaint #200007150, October 2000

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant:	Male
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200106392, August 2001
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed	Hispanic Male, 37	Unfounded
Force: Chokehold	Hispanic Male, 37	Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Hispanic Male, 37	Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Hispanic Male, 37	Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Hispanic Male, 37	Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200007150, October 2000
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Black Male, 15	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Male	Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.