Michael Lamm

Badge #28302, White Male
Former Police Officer at Drug Abuse Resistance Education Unit
Service started January 1985, ended February 2001, Tax #885916

Complaints

5 Complaints
8 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #8804431, December 1988
Allegation: Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #8803451, September 1988
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #8703797, September 1987
Allegation: Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Arrest/D. A. T.
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #8701936, May 1987
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #8602696, July 1986
Allegation: Force: Gun as club
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #8804431, December 1988
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #8803451, September 1988
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #8703797, September 1987
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun pointed Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Arrest/D. A. T. Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #8701936, May 1987
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Nasty Words Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #8602696, July 1986
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun as club Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.