Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Kerwin M. Adames
Badge #12777,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 70th Precinct since October 2020
Service
started April 2017,
made $111,000 last year,
Tax #963356
Lawsuit settlements:
$60,000 Johnson, Keenan vs City of New York, et al., 2022 KCSC KCSC 530193/2021
View Details
$60,000 Johnson, Keenan vs City of New York, et al., 2022 KCSC KCSC 530193/2021
View Details
Complaints
3
Complaints
8
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
3
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
Complaint #202311677,
December 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202300858,
January 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #201907537,
August 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Penalty: | Formalized Training |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202311677, December 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 30-34 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202300858, January 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 21-24 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 21-24 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201907537, August 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Male, 25 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Black Male, 25 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 25 | Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions) |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Black Male, 25 | Exonerated |
| Penalty: Formalized Training | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Lawsuits
Johnson, Keenan vs City of New York, et al.Case # 530193/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, April 14, 2022, ended August 31, 2023
$60,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 11, 2020, P.O. entered Plaintiff’s residence at 360 East 29th Street, Brooklyn. P.O. entered upon the Plaintiff’s residence without a warrant, permission, or consent and otherwise being justified. After P.O. entered Plaintiff’s residence, P.O. shot and killed Casper. Right after the killing of Casper, Plaintiff arrived at and attempted to enter his residence and render care to Casper. Then P.O. SUKHNANDAN and ADAMS seized Plaintiff, threw him to the grand, and placed Plaintiff tightly in handcuffs. The arrest was no probable cause. Due to a false statement, Plaintiff was maliciously prosecuted for a period of two months; Then, criminal proceedings were terminated favorably to Plaintiff.