Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2022-26679
Closed: 7/4/2023
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, forfeiture of time/leave balances, training
Recommendation: A-CD, training
Case: 2022-26683
Closed: 10/11/2022
Case Details:
-
Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $90,000 total settlements.
Batiz, Marlon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 802146/2022E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 11, 2022, ended December 5, 2022
$90,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 20, 2020, Plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity of Prospect Avenue and East 163rd Street in Bronx County. At approximately 10:30 pm, Defendants Rodriguez, Mobarek, Crosby, Doe, and Roe approached Plaintiff for no reason. Defendant officers did not have a warrant, probable cause, reasonable cause, or any legal justification, and based on fraud, perjury, and misrepresentations, stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained Plaintiff in an aggressive and excessive manner. Plaintiff was subject to a strip search without any legal reason or justification. Plaintiff was arraigned after his arrest and thereafter falsely and maliciously prosecuted with committing a crime.
Broughton, Alijah vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 032580/2019,
Supreme Court - Bronx, November 19, 2019