Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Word
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Word
Matthew B. Mcgrath
Badge #23245,
White Male
Police Officer at Midtown North Precinct since May 2021
Service
started November 2020,
made $63,500 last year,
Tax #969967
Complaints
1
Complaint
8
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3
Unable to Determine
2
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202207665,
November 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: | Command Discipline - B |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day) |
| Complaint #202207665, November 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Male, 40-44 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 40-44 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons | Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 40-44 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B | ||
| Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day) | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2024-29980
Closed: 5/16/2024
Case Details:
- Wrongfully deactivated their body-worn camera.
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B