Daniel M. Moussannef

Daniel M. Moussannef

Daniel M. Moussannef
Badge #14212, White Male
Police Officer at Intelligence Division since August 2023
Service started April 2019, made $58,900 last year, Tax #967618

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27226
Closed: 4/23/2024

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
4 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202104907, August 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202103536, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202103633, June 2021
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202103284, May 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, October 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202104907, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 40-44 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #202103536, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 35-39 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202103633, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray Black Female, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202103284, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Hispanic Male, 45-49 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Hispanic Male, 35-39 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 45-49 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Hispanic Male, 45-49 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, October 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27226
Closed: 4/23/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully issued a summons to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (10 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Bacote, Kenneth vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 510559/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, May 11, 2021

Other Documents