Peter Koniuch

Former Lieutenant at Narcotics Division Queens Southeast INIT
Service started January 1985, Tax #913068
White Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Person Searched

Complaints

6 Complaints
8 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #9801869, April 1998
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #6294248, May 1994
Allegation: Abuse of Authority
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #6293205, May 1993
Allegation: Abuse of Authority
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #6289023, January 1989
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #6288349, July 1988
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #6287515, October 1987
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #9801869, April 1998
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Person Searched Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #6294248, May 1994
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #6293205, May 1993
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #6289023, January 1989
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #6288349, July 1988
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #6287515, October 1987
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.