James M. Stalikas

Badge #7762, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since November 2019
Also served at 47th Precinct
Service started July 2015, made $157,000 last year, Tax #959268

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Chokehold
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-23487
Closed: 6/1/2021

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
18 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Complainant Uncooperative
5 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202104948, June 2021
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202004608, June 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201907212, August 2019
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, April 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #201904998, June 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201900569, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201602225, March 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: White Male, 62
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202104948, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Male, 30-34 Exonerated
Force: Vehicle Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202004608, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 55-59 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Female, 55-59 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201907212, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 18-20 Exonerated
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, April 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #201904998, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Exonerated
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201900569, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 33 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 33 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 33 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 33 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201602225, March 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop White Male, 62 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-23487
Closed: 6/1/2021
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Discourtesy
Penalty: Vacation days (5 days)


Lawsuits

Doe, Jane vs Ciagencyty of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV11414, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 10, 2018
Complaint
Description: On February 7, 2018, the Plaintiff was arrested by the NYPD Defendants P.O. Katherine Paez and five unnamed officers for a misdemeanor related to a September 2017 family dispute. The Plaintiff was 40 weeks pregnant and visibly so - her baby's due date was February 9. Officer Paez noted that the Plaintiff was nine months pregnant in her arrest log. For the entirety of the proceeding 30 hours of her detention, the Plaintiff was shackled using a combination of metal handcuffs at her wrists and ankles. At no point did the Plaintiff present as a threat to herself or others, or as a flight risk. She was not offered food or water between 10:40AM and 7:40PM while she was held in a cell at the Precinct. At 7:40PM, the ...

Other Documents