Craig M. Victorino

Badge #984, White Male, 43
Detective Grade 2 at Ceis Asset Forfeiture Unit since November 2020
Also served at Detective Bureau Criminal Enterprise Division, 75th Precinct, Gang Squad Brooklyn North
Service started January 2008, made $165,000 last year, Tax #946368

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Lawsuit settlements:
$7,500   James, Jamel vs Victorino, Craig, et al., 2012 EDNY EDNY 12CV04044
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201408299, August 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201302786, April 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Instructions
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Formalized Training, April 2016
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #201211134, August 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201408299, August 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 23 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201302786, April 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 18 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Instructions
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Formalized Training, April 2016
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #201211134, August 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 26 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $7,500 total settlements.

James, Jamel vs Victorino, Craig, et al.
Case # 12CV04044, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 15, 2012, ended January 4, 2013
$7,500 Settlement

Roc v. City of New York et al
Case # 007014/2012, Supreme Court - Kings