Miguel Acevedo

Badge #7402, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Manhattan Court Section
Also served at 43rd Precinct
Service started January 2012, ended December 2019, Tax #951478


Complaints

3 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complaint Withdrawn
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201605488, June 2016
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201601172, February 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201509124, October 2015
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201605488, June 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 23 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 23 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201601172, February 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Hispanic Male, 40 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 40 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question Hispanic Male, 40 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201509124, October 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2012-8591
Opened: 1/24/2013
Closed: 9/16/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Made misleading statements to officers investigating a report of a stolen automobile
Penalty: Forfeiture of fifteen (15) vacation days