Michael Ryan

Michael Ryan

Michael Ryan
Badge #4476, White Male
Police Officer at Transit Bureau District 3 since August 2020
Service started April 2019, made $70,100 last year, Tax #967678

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30444
Closed: 5/14/2024

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202208724, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202208649, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202208724, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202208649, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30444
Closed: 5/14/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
  2. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Morel, Dionny vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 161187/2023, Supreme Court - New York, January 6, 2023