Gerard Amato

Badge #6291, White Male
Former Detective Grade 3 at DA Brooklyn
Service started February 1994, ended December 2019, Tax #905688

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200704460, February 2007
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Black Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200201330, February 2002
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #9702596, July 1997
Allegation: Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200704460, February 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Gender Black Female, 25 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200201330, February 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 36 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #9702596, July 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other - Force Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Exonerated
Discourtesy: Curse Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Government Employees Insurance Company A/s/o Coffee, Thelma V., et al. vs Rosa Hacking Corp., et al.
Case # 017861-2013, Civil Court - Queens, August 28, 2014, ended February 6, 2018
Zero Disposition