Christophe Malerba

Badge #28856, White Male
Former Police Officer at 105th Precinct
Service started July 2001, ended June 2012, Tax #928688


Complaints

11 Complaints
14 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Complaint Withdrawn
5 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200817949, November 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200811631, August 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200805133, April 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200512603, October 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200508656, July 2005
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #200502420, March 2005
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200411221, November 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone
Complainant: Black Female, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200405324, June 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200402543, March 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200301786, March 2003
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200203447, May 2002
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200817949, November 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 37 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200811631, August 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200805133, April 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200512603, October 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 42 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 42 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200508656, July 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 29 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200502420, March 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 52 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200411221, November 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone Black Female, 38 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 38 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200405324, June 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200402543, March 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 31 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200301786, March 2003
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 23 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200203447, May 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Black Male, 17 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2009-288
Opened: 7/6/2009
Closed: 4/16/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While performing overtime, wrongfully performed administrative duties on two separate dates when said member should have performed enforcement duties
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully caused false entries to be made in Department records by submitting an overtime activity sheet that listed enforcement duties that were not performed during overtime hours
  3. Guilty: Wrongfully made false entries in said member's activity log
  4. Guilty: Failed to notify desk officer that said member was present for duty
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of forty (40) suspension days, twenty (20) vacation days, forfeiture of time/leave.

Case: 2010-897
Opened: 4/7/2010
Closed: 4/16/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on sick report wrongfully caused false entries to be made in Department records
  2. Guilty: While on sick report wrongfully caused false entries to be made in Department records
  3. Guilty: While on sick report wrongfully exaggerated limitations in operating a motor vehicle and the need to ambulate with a cane
Penalty: See case# 2009-288 for penalty

Case: 2010-899
Opened: 4/7/2010
Closed: 4/16/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully utilized Department computer on two occasions for inquiries unrelated to the official business of the Department
  2. Guilty: Having wrongfully obtained personal information on an individual known to the Department from a Department computer, left a message on said individual's voicemail
Penalty: See case 2009-288 for penalty