Joseph J. Jacobsen

Badge #23247, White Male
Police Officer at 75th Precinct since December 2017
Service started October 2016, made $127,000 last year, Tax #962498

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25536
Closed: 12/2/2022
Case: 2022-25537
Closed: 11/17/2022

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
13 Allegations
4 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
5 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202307060, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202102264, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202004324, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, June 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003196, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202307060, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202102264, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202004324, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 40-44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 40-44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, June 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202003196, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25536
Closed: 12/2/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
  3. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25537
Closed: 11/17/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Ragland, Craig Millington vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 535201/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, December 8, 2022
Complaint
Description: On June 4, 2021, Plaintiff was a passenger in a lawfully parked vehicle in Brooklyn when defendant NYPD Officers, including MARC WHIRL, JOSEPH JACOBSEN and other unknown officers, unlawfully stopped, questioned, searched, and falsely arrested Plaintiff without probable cause or legal justification. Defendants ordered Plaintiff to exit the vehicle and performed an illegal search of Plaintiff’s person, without any basis. Defendant Officers performed also an illegal search of the vehicle. They claimed having found a firearm whereas Plaintiff did not possess one. Plaintiff was grabbed, handcuffed and, transported to the 75th Police Precinct. 12h later, Plaintiff was transported to the central booking where he staye...

Cruz, Robert vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 21CV03367, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, July 6, 2021
Complaint

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaint #202001510