Alfredo Alba

Badge #145, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Strategic Response Group 2 Bronx
Also served at Patrol Borough Bronx Task Force
Service started January 2004, ended February 2024, Tax #933598

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Lawsuit settlements:
$17,500   Sanders, Shamar vs City of New York, et al., 2012 BCSC BCSC 306614/2012
View Details

Articles

2020 NYC Protests, CCRB, 1/24/2023

Complaints

6 Complaints
17 Allegations
6 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Complainant Unavailable
2 Exonerated
3 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202305193, May 2023
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202201877, March 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202102795, May 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #201013901, October 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201010081, July 2010
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200615469, November 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202305193, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other Black Female, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202201877, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202102795, May 2020
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #201013901, October 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male Complainant Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201010081, July 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Handcuffs too tight Hispanic Male, 47 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 47 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200615469, November 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 36 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 36 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Black Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Sanders, Shamar vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 306614/2012, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 9, 2012, ended March 26, 2013
$17,500 Settlement

Other Documents