Jorge R. Ramos

Jorge R. Ramos

Jorge R. Ramos
Badge #7160, Hispanic Male
Detective Grade 3 at Gun Violence Suppression Division Zone 01 since September 2023
Also served at Police Service Area 3
Service started October 2017, made $134,000 last year, Tax #964719

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Gender

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29326
Closed: 5/21/2024
Case: 2022-25493
Closed: 6/8/2022

View Details

Complaints

14 Complaints
34 Allegations
6 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Closed - Pending Litigation
6 Complainant Unavailable
5 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
4 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202304370, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202303077, April 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202302150, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202301437, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202301273, January 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202300206, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202208480, December 2022
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202208314, November 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202206586, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202202704, April 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202202474, April 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202106117, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202005486, July 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202104641, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202304370, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202303077, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 10-14 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 10-14 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202302150, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 15-17 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202301437, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 15-17 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 15-17 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 15-17 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 15-17 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202301273, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202300206, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 10-14 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 10-14 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202208480, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Gender Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Other Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202208314, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202206586, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202202704, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202202474, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202106117, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202005486, July 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202104641, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 45-49 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29326
Closed: 5/21/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare a property clerk's invoice worksheet, as required. failed to safeguard prisoner property.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25493
Closed: 6/8/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits.

Terry, Indika vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 534256/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, November 29, 2022
Complaint
Description: On May 18, 2022, plaintiff was walking towards a friend's residence when defendant-officers Jorge R. Ramos, Steven Guerrero, and two other officers exited their vehicle and approach plaintiff. Defendant-Officers Ramos and Guerrero began a search without probable cause. Officers Ramos and Guerrero pushed plaintiff to the ground, pulled his hoodie over his head, and punched him multiple times about the face. Plaintiff did not resist arrest. Other defendant-officers failed to intervene despite witnessing the actions of Ramos and Guerrero. Defendant-officers refused to provide plaintiff with information regarding his alleged charges. After processing at Housing Police Service Area 3, Plaintiff was transported to Wo...

Cooper, Joshua vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 532554/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, November 10, 2022
Complaint
Description: On June 1, 2022, Plaintiff was lawfully standing on the street when officers Krishawn Denton and Detective Jorge Ramos approached him and a group of friends. After a brief conversation, the officers threw Plaintiff to the ground causing injury to Plaintiff's neck, back, shoulder and arm. The officers arrested Plaintiff, and gave the DA false information that Plaintiff obstructed governmental administration. The case against Plaintiff was dismissed.

Tinsley, Derrick vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 527100/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, September 19, 2022
Complaint
Description: On May 23, 2022, Plaintiff was lawfully within the premises and business known as Family Dollar in Brooklyn when he was restrained and detained by Defendant police officers, including JORGE SANTON, KONRAD TYBOROWSKI, PASCUAL MELLO, RAMOS and other unknown officers without just cause or provocation and with excessive force. Plaintiff was physically assaulted and handcuffed which caused Plaintiff to be injured, physically sick and disturbed. He was transported to the 79th Precinct without any legal basis.

Other Documents