Jamar C. Burke

Jamar C. Burke

Jamar C. Burke
Badge #18983, Black Male
Police Officer at 120th Precinct since November 2019
Also served at 77th Precinct
Service started July 2015, made $118,000 last year, Tax #958349

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30590
Closed: 5/16/2024

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300475, January 2023
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202003751, October 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202300475, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Restricted Breathing Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202003751, October 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30590
Closed: 5/16/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Training