Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits.
Imbert, Odalis V. Erbetta, Robert, et al.
Case # 158574/2021,
Supreme Court - New York, March 2, 2022
Complaint
Description: On September 18, 2018, Plaintiff was lawfully in and around his residence in Manhattan. Plaintiff was locked out of his home and proceeded to crawl through a window to reenter the residence when a neighbor called 911 and reported a break in. When Defendants arrived, including DANIEL WYNNE, JOHN BONHOMME, JOSEPH DURENBERGER, JUSTIN VARTANIAN, HANG, FERGUSON, HICIANO-GOMEZ and J. KENNEDY, the observed Plaintiff then broke in, the NYPD Defendants ordered Plaintiff's girlfriend out of her home and forced themselves past her and into the residence, drew their weapons, and ordered Plaintiff to get onto
his knees and put his hands up.
While Plaintiff was on his knees. The NYPD Defendants deployed tasers, which
penetr...
Pichardo, Ermiluis vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 022237/2020E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 11, 2020
Padilla, Chris vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 158890/2019E,
Supreme Court - New York, September 25, 2019
Padilla, Chris vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 150642/2019,
Supreme Court - New York, May 2, 2019
Settlement
