Terrance Johnson

Badge #1736, Black Male
Former Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Queens North
Also served at Narcotics Division Queens North INIT
Service started January 1987, ended October 2005, Tax #891669

Complaints

3 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200204259, June 2002
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9604701, October 1996
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9001911, June 1990
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200204259, June 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Hispanic Female, 33 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 33 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Hispanic Female, 33 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9604701, October 1996
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Person Searched Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9001911, June 1990
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.