Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case Details:
-
Failed to activate their body worn camera.
-
Failed to obtain medical treatment.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Case: 2022-24752
Closed: 5/20/2022
Case Details:
-
Engaged in conduct prejudicial to the good order, efficiency, and discipline of the Department.
Penalty: Instructions
Recommendation: No disciplinary action
Del Valle, Steven vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV02417,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 21, 2015, ended March 29, 2016
$37,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant stopped and questioned Plaintiff while he was visiting his friend at their residence and when Plaintiff asked why he was being hassled he was assaulted by two un-uniformed officers and two uniformed officers. Plaintiff brought to 72nd precinct and charged with § 140.10A Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree, § 221.05 Unlawful Possession of Marijuana, §205.30 Resisting Arrest, § 140.05 Criminal Trespass in the 4th Degree, and§ 140.15, Criminal Trespass in the 2nd Degree, all later dismissed