Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Rogers, Mario vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 525127/2023,
Supreme Court - Kings, August 29, 2023
Anderson Jr., Clifton vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 518061/2023,
Supreme Court - Kings, June 22, 2023
Cooper, Joshua vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 532554/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, November 10, 2022
Complaint
Description: On June 1, 2022, Plaintiff was lawfully standing on the street when officers Krishawn Denton and Detective Jorge Ramos approached him and a group of friends. After a brief conversation, the officers threw Plaintiff to the ground causing injury to Plaintiff's neck, back, shoulder and arm. The officers arrested Plaintiff, and gave the DA false information that Plaintiff obstructed governmental administration. The case against Plaintiff was dismissed.
