Complaint #200105489, July 2001

Incident: July 12, 2001
Received: July 24, 2001
Closed: December 31, 2003


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 63rd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Daniel Arrao, Scott Bonney, John Dimarco, Steven Esposito, Eric Jahrnes, Anthony Lanzillotta, Nancy Lipnicky, James Littman, Thomas Masone, Michael Mcglynn, Joseph Mcneill, Horace Norville, Peter Oneill, Joseph Orrico, Louis Pepe, Christophe Quattrocchi, Frank Savino, Angelina Sheehan
Officer: Lubrano, Cosmo
Complainant: Male, 17
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Lubrano, Cosmo
Complainant: Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Lubrano, Cosmo
Complainant: Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Lubrano, Cosmo
Complainant: Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Lubrano, Cosmo
Complainant: Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lubrano, Cosmo
Complainant: Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Lubrano, Cosmo Male, 17 Offensive Language: Race Substantiated (Charges)
Lubrano, Cosmo Male, 17 Force: Other Substantiated (Charges)
Lubrano, Cosmo Male, 17 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Charges)
Lubrano, Cosmo Male, 17 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Charges)
Lubrano, Cosmo Male, 17 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Lubrano, Cosmo Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated

Penalty

Lubrano, Cosmo
No Disciplinary Action-SOL
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.