Complaint #200303439, May 2003

Incident: May 7, 2003
Received: May 12, 2003
Closed: September 27, 2004

Reason for contact: Report-possession/sale of narcotics
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 88th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - assault (against a PO)

Witness Officers: Leontyne Garner, Jorge Jimenez, Evel Morales, Ray Williams

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Force: Radio as club
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Scarlato, Claudio
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lamneck, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lamneck, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lamneck, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Singh, Deodhram
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Henry, Aubrey
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 25-29	Force: Radio as club	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 25-29	Discourtesy: Word	Officer(s) Unidentified
Scarlato, Claudio	Black Male, 25	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Lamneck, Michael	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched	Unsubstantiated
Lamneck, Michael	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Lamneck, Michael	Black Male, 25	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Singh, Deodhram	Black Male, 25	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Henry, Aubrey	Black Male, 25	Force: Physical force	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.