Complaint #200600496, November 2005

Incident: November 15, 2005
Received: January 12, 2006
Closed: May 29, 2007

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 109th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Christop Kelly

Officer:	Liakos, Andrew
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Liakos, Andrew
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Abdul, Patrick
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Abdul, Patrick
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Abdul, Patrick
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Abdul, Patrick
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Abdul, Patrick
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Liakos, Andrew
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Liakos, Andrew	Hispanic Male, 20	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Exonerated
Liakos, Andrew	Hispanic Male, 20	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Abdul, Patrick	Hispanic Male, 20	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Abdul, Patrick	Hispanic Male, 20	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Abdul, Patrick	Hispanic Male, 20	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Abdul, Patrick	Hispanic Male, 20	Force: Chokehold	Unfounded
Abdul, Patrick	Hispanic Male, 20	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Liakos, Andrew	Hispanic Male, 20	Force: Physical force	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.