Complaint #202205456, August 2022

Incident: August 7, 2022
Received: August 19, 2022
Closed: September 25, 2023


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: NYCHA
In NYPD 25th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Clement Augustin, Imdadul Chowdhury, Ernesto Crisostomo, Christian Fernandez, Ana Galvan, Richard Johannes, Daniel Liu, David Lopez, Robert Mayer, Kyle Mondesir, Meagan Morea, Racine Otway, Jose Pichardo, Patrick Richardson, John Serrano, Jesus Silva, Jason Vera, Joseph Wozniak, Erickson Zamora
Officer: Jimenez, Larry
Complainant: Female, 40-44
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Leonard, Lutzen
Complainant: Female, 18-20
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Byrus, Allyssa
Complainant: Female, 40-44
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Byrus, Allyssa
Complainant: Female, 40-44
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Jimenez, Larry
Complainant: Female, 40-44
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Peloso, John
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Peloso, John
Complainant: Female, 18-20
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Peloso, John
Complainant: Female, 18-20
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Peloso, John
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Peloso, John
Complainant: Female, 18-20
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Jimenez, Larry
Complainant: Female, 40-44
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Peloso, John
Complainant: Female, 18-20
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Rodriguez, Marcos
Complainant: Female, 18-20
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Stanton, Dean
Complainant: Female, 18-20
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Leonard, Lutzen
Complainant: Female, 18-20
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Jimenez, Larry Female, 40-44 Force: Physical force Unable to Determine
Leonard, Lutzen Female, 18-20 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Byrus, Allyssa Female, 40-44 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Byrus, Allyssa Female, 40-44 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unfounded
Jimenez, Larry Female, 40-44 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Within NYPD Guidelines
Peloso, John Discourtesy: Word Within NYPD Guidelines
Peloso, John Female, 18-20 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Peloso, John Female, 18-20 Offensive Language: Gender Substantiated (Charges)
Peloso, John Discourtesy: Word Within NYPD Guidelines
Peloso, John Female, 18-20 Discourtesy: Word Within NYPD Guidelines
Jimenez, Larry Female, 40-44 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Unable to Determine
Peloso, John Female, 18-20 Force: Hit against inanimate object Within NYPD Guidelines
Rodriguez, Marcos Female, 18-20 Force: Hit against inanimate object Within NYPD Guidelines
Stanton, Dean Female, 18-20 Force: Hit against inanimate object Within NYPD Guidelines
Leonard, Lutzen Female, 18-20 Force: Hit against inanimate object Unfounded

Penalty

Peloso, John
Pending
APU - Decision Pending


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.