Marcos Rodriguez

Marcos Rodriguez

Marcos Rodriguez
Badge #30263, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Police Service Area 5 since January 2015
Service started January 2013, made $123,000 last year, Tax #954285

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-24234
Closed: 6/5/2023

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$25,000   Pleasant, Deavionne vs Rodriguez, Marcos, et al., 2022 NYCSC NYCSC 158056/2021
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
8 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202205456, August 2022
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Female, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201910389, November 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201906838, July 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201902743, March 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201701627, February 2017
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201607362, August 2016
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201400248, January 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202205456, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Female, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201910389, November 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 10-14 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 10-14 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201906838, July 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201902743, March 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201701627, February 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Female Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201607362, August 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 40 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201400248, January 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-24234
Closed: 6/5/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  2. Failed to prepare required reports.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Pleasant, Deavionne vs Rodriguez, Marcos, et al.
Case # 158056/2021, Supreme Court - New York, May 9, 2022, ended January 9, 2023
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 28, 2019, at approximately 9:30 p.m, Plaintiff was lawfully walking in the vicinity of 505 E 120th Street in New York. Defendant Officers were already in that area investigating a larceny. Suddenly and without provocation, Defendant officers rushed upon Plaintiff, grabbing him and forcibly detaining him. Defendants did not observe Plaintiff committing any crime or violating any law or local ordinance. Plaintiff was subjected to an identification procedure. Defendants were told that Plaintiff was not the suspect but continued to place Plaintiff in handcuffs. Even though Defendants were aware Plaintiff was identified as the non-perpetrator and had one or more individuals who could vouch for his whereabou...

Other Documents